But not many in the industry even acknowledge the sidebands. And typically, the 
casual listener isn't looking for a station 10 or even 20 kHz away from their 
IBOC locals.

And we do need to remember that even if the radio's case looks similar, what's 
inside doesn't have to be.

Russ Edmunds
Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL )
[15 mi NNW of Philadelphia]
40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20id
<[email protected]>
FM: Yamaha T-80 & Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'
AM: Modified Sony ICF 2010 barefoot


--- On Sun, 5/31/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] Tecsun PL-300WT DSP-enhanced Ultralight Radio--Amazing 
> Performance
> To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" 
> <[email protected]>
> Date: Sunday, May 31, 2009, 2:56 PM
> Hey Russ:
> 
> Yeah, I could see how that could go either way.  If
> DSP is too restrictive
> in bandwidth and sounds muffled, then go with traditional
> filtering in the
> Americas.  However, the pro for offering a DSP
> receiver on this side of
> the pond would be that having DSP filtering would allow the
> casual
> listener, in regular old AM mode, to avoid picking up the
> digital
> sidebands of the station they are listening to.  I
> have heard that cheap
> receivers with barn-door wide filtering pick up those
> sidebands, meaning
> that the already-poor analog audio of an IBOC station is
> even worse now
> that they pick up the dreaded hiss of their own IBOC
> signal!  Now they
> know how stations (and DXers) on adjacent channels feel...
> 
> My gut tells me that the G8 borrowed the unique 24 time
> zone clock feature
> of the PL-300WT, but still has the receiver section of much
> lesser models.
>  I could see how Tecsun could lift the clock feature and
> put it in
> virtually any other design.
> 
> Kevin
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Given the performance of the
> >> PL-300WT, why they would dumb it down to the G8 is
> anyone's
> >> guess.
> >> Perhaps Grundig believes that such a radio should
> be a
> >> little bigger, and
> >> that North American consumers don't need, aren't
> savvy
> >> about, and/or don't
> >> want the restricted bandwidth of, DSP?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Here's one guess - Most of the rest of the world isn't
> using IBOC to
> > achieve digital AM. The US is. To the extent that
> Grundig's sales of
> > portables is skewed to the US, that could be the
> answer to your question.
> >
> >
> >
> > Russ Edmunds
> > Blue Bell, PA ( 360' ASL )
> > [15 mi NNW of Philadelphia]
> > 40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20id
> > <[email protected]>
> > FM: Yamaha T-80 & Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'
> > AM: Modified Sony ICF 2010 barefoot
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list
> are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect
> the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: [email protected]
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are
> those of the original contributors and do not necessarily
> reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing
> staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: [email protected]
> 
> 


      

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to