Hi John and Colin, Thanks for your TP reports, which agreed with the good Asian conditions here. For some reason, 675-VOV was stronger here yesterday, when it finally had no 680 splatter (so I could make a decent recording of it). Today it was also at a good level, but troubled with the usual 680 QRM. It has been a regular visitor with audio here for most of the month, during peak sunrise enhancement. 73, Gary (in Puyallup, WA) In a message dated 9/17/2009 11:05:04 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:
> This morning must be an example of different antenna systems hearing > different things, entirely. My morning was quite different from > Walt's, but similar to Colin's: I've never gheard 675 VOV so strong... Just for the > heck of it, I // them with their internet feed and it was slightly > better :>). This is the 1st morning ever where I have had 675 VOV in 100% copy with no trace of QRM. You are correct - there has been little sign of any of the flea-JJ stations -- just the top tier. Has been years since I had a good signal from the Russian on 576 - quite amazing. -- ............................................................................ .............. Colin Newell - Editor - CoffeeCrew DOT Com --- Victoria, British Columbia - Blog - Coffee DOT BC DOT CA DXer DOT CA and Bob Harris DOT Com ------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected] _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
