Listened this morning between 13:23 and 14:14 and noticed immediately that things weren't as good as previous mornings, except that the JJ stations were sounding very nice this morning and were still present, in the case of 774 until 15:00 when I left for the office. SF 71, A3, K0. Perhaps with the near non-existent solar activity, any mention of solar indices is nearly useless for our purposes. As always, a "6" unless otherwise noted. Started as usual at the bottom and worked "north".
189: 8.5 279: 9 531: NHK1 at 9 level at 13:28 558: music at 6 level 567: NHK1 at 9 level 576: RR at 13:31 at 9 585: NHK1 at 8 level 594: 9 level NHK1 603: KK and strong cochannel this morning at 8 level 612: 7 level JOLK and another unid cochannel at 13:37 621: CC and het from N. Korea early at 7 level, but later North Korea at 14:17 666: NHK1 at 8 level at 13:39 693: NHK2 at 7 level 702: NHK2 at 7 level at 13:43 711 720: CNR2 at 8 level at 13:44 792: ? N. Korea at 6.5 738: CC with buzz at 7 747: 8 level NHK2 756 774: 9 level NHK2 and still going at 7.5 at 15:00! 819 828: 9 level NHK2 and cochannel 855: North Korea at 8 level 13:50 864: 2 cochannels. One with talk and other with music. ?who at 7 level 873: NHK2 at 8 level 882: 6 only today 891: 7 level 918: 8 level Shandong with echo at 13:57 927, 936 963: CRI RR and CC cochannel at 14:01 972: 9 level KK 981 1017: 7 1026: CC at 8 level 1035, 1044, 1053, 1089 1116: 7 1125, 1134, 1143 1206: Yanbian presumed KK at 14:08 at 8 level 1224, 1233 1242: JJ at 7 1269: 7 1278 1287: JJ at 8 level 14;09 1323: 7 level CRI RR with Guy's 1322 station causing an audible het 1377: CNR1 at 8 level 14:11 1503: 7 level JOUK at 14:13 1512 1566: 6 level HLAZ by 14:13 but 2 carriers noted: 1566.008 (presumed HLAZ) and 1566.027. 1575: VOA 8 level at 14:14 That's it from me until tomorrow! .....Walt. _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
