Oops, slept in this morning (this early morning after morning rising must have caught up to me), and didn't get to the dials until 13:54 UTC. SF 70 A1, K0. Things seemed pretty good, but nothing spectacular. Best of the morning was a solid 9 for Vietnam on 675. Funny how some mornings they're so strong and on many other good mornings, virtually nothing! "6" unless otherwise noted:
540: hum/CC at 6 549: 7 in RR at 13:59 //576 558: 7 with mx 567: JJ and cochannel at 9 576: RR at 8 level 585: 7 with JJ 594: JJ at 9 level at 14:01 603: music and cochannel at 9 level 13:57 612: Brisbane at 9 level 14:02 621: 9 level. Sounds very North Korean, but not //3250 as listed in PAL 657: North Korea at 7 666: 7 level JJ at 14:03 675: Vietnam at 9 level 702 711: 7 level pres KBS1, but +++ splatter from KBS1 738: 8 level CC music at 14:05 747: 7 level JJ 756: 7 level CNR1. Strong carrier but weak modulation 765: 6.5 level music at 14:07 774: JJ at 14:00 and still 9+ at 14:24 along with weak DU cochannel 783: 7 792: 7 with music 14:10 801: 7 819: Near 10 level North Korea //2850 at 14:11. Strongest of the morning. 828: JJ at 9 837, 846 855: North Korea at 8 864, 873 882: nothing at 14:00,but fair mumbly talk at 14:13. Sure want to know for sure who this is. On my hit list for Masset this weekend. 891 936: CC at 8 963: 8 level CRI RR at 13:55 // 1323 972: 8 level KK at 14:15 981: 7 level at 14:16 ?CNR1 but splatter +++ from 990 1008 1017: 8 level CRI KK at 14:17 1053 1089: 7 level 1242: 8 level JJ at 14:18 1287: 7 level JJ 1323: CRI RR at 13:55 8 level 1557: presumed WYFR at 14:20 at 6 1566: HLAZ at 7.5 only at 13:55, and nothing at 14:20 1575: 9 level at 13:54 VOA and still a 9 at 14:21 1593: CC at 14:21 at 7 level. X-Band: absent That's it for the morning, albeit abbreviated! .....Walt _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
