Was particularly bleary eyed this morning it seems, as it took awhile to 
realize that the best antenna had broken in the night, and it wasn't possible 
to find the problem in the dark.   DXed with what I had (the northerly Flag), 
and must say that conditions seemed quite odd until about 1415UT or so, meaning 
that even the big gun Japanese were down, signals were erratic, and 594 for 
example was battling with something else with an oriental sound to it.   At 
around 1415 however, things settled down to more normal, but didn't seem as 
good as yesterday.   Quit listening a little after 1430 as a result.

pretty darn good audio (at least briefly): 

279 R. Rosii
558 KK talk, so HLQH, but not at this strength until 1423UT
594 JOAK , not until later
774 JOUB later
828 JOBB later
972 HLCA the biggest station of the morning until the big Japanese recovered 
later on.
1575 VoA



reasonable audio  at  times during the period (though often battling w/splash 
or noise):

189 R. Rossii
567 JOIK //594 at 1406
612 JOLK //594 at 1420
747 JOIB but not until 1415UT
936 likely Anhui at 1408UT
1566 HLAZ, maybe peaking up a little higher later
  


not so reasonable audio, occasional words in splash or noise: 

585 JOPG //594
603 2 stations
621 CC talk
702 N. Korea w/ubiquitous hum 
756 3 and 1 pips at 1400, likely HLKA; CC pips underneath
846 NHK1 synchros //594
873 JOGB //774
945 CNR-1, but at least one other, didn't seem to be NHK1
1017 CRI, operatic singing //5965
1377 CNR-1 //5030




Burbles in the splatter and noise:

153, 657 (mostly hum), 1098, 1269, 1278, 1287  plus others not noted, as they 
were only around for a few seconds at a time







Strongish het, no audio (either undermodulated or ravaged by splatter):

1251


best wishes,

Nick



*****************************
Nick Hall-Patch
Victoria, BC
Canada  

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to