Not like 1510 in Boston is anything worth listening to these days ;)


On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 8:17 PM, bill kral <[email protected]> wrote:

> Radio noise in the 60s was minimal with only two man made sources to screw
> up the excellent reception(especially in the winter during clear
> weather).One was the tv whine produced on some frequencies if it was in the
> hearing range and the other was those pesty fluorescent light tubes with the
> faulty starter cans and then of course lightning in the summer every 3
> days.Without the pests,it was possible to listen to the big guys in the
> Eastern states from eastern New Brunswick during daylight hours.Some of
> these big guys were coming in from Boston,Albany,Buffalo,NYC,Baltimore,and
> other big cities.From Saint John NB it was and maybe still is possible to
> listen comfortably to 1510 in Boston 24/7/365 across 300 wet miles.Those
> were the days of good DX with barefoot transistor portables.BILL in BC
>
>
>
>      __________________________________________________________________
> Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!
>
> http://www.flickr.com/gift/
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: [email protected]
>
>


-- 
Sincerely,
Paul B. Walker, Jr.
www.onairdj.com
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to