Quite the delay here with this, but there wasn't anything too exciting to report. Listened for a bit at 1445UT, then came back for about 15 minutes at 1515UT, and, as others have noted, not exciting. A bit of a lift in the latter listening period didn't conceal the fact that the starting point was fairly poor.
>pretty darn good audio (all of it understandable by a native speaker, at least >briefly): 594 JOAK; the only one at this strength, once at 1447, but didn't return to this level until 1521 when it hung in there for a bit; there was someone underneath at 1532... reasonable audio at times during the period (much of it understandable by a native speaker, though often battling w/splash or noise): 567 JOIK //594 by 1527, after complete non appearance earlier 639 CNR-1 //5030 774 JOUB 828 JOBB 972 HLCA but not until 1528UT not so reasonable audio, occasional words or phrases in splash or noise could be understood by a native speaker 747 JOIB 1008 something Asiatic, but only music when it was at this level Burbles in the splatter and noise (if lucky, language might be guessed at by cadence of talk, or parallel established by changes in talk or music) : 531 JOQG //594 at 1515 585 JOPG //594 at 1527 603 seemed //558, at 1526, so both S. Korea 612 JOLK //594 at 1523 675 never more than this level here despite Gary and John's findings 711 could have been KK talk by man at 1518, just too murky 738 mx at 1524 945 CNR-1 //5030 at 1528UT 1287 JOHR? Strongish het, no audio (either undermodulated or ravaged by splatter): 1566 of course.... Also, a recording run with KGO-810 off yielded the Russian pips that Bruce heard at 1000UT, but not very strong at all. best wishes, Nick ***************************** Nick Hall-Patch Victoria, BC Canada _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
