Well Patrick, not *exactly* the same letter sent to the 1620 in Stayton - that one contained lots of detail about what would possibly make the station illegal. The Portland agent (or operative, if you prefer :) ) mentioned that his vertical whip was complaint but noted that the transmitter was grounded to a 40' tower and so on. The details in the Flagstaff report didn't mention what he saw, at all (except for the reading). FWIW - the Portalnd Agent seemed quite thorough and that is a good thing.
Dave in Indy ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:30:52 -0800 From: [email protected] (Patrick Martin) To: [email protected] (Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America) Subject: Re: [IRCA] KBXZ-1650 Flagstaff Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII Apparently the same letter to Stayton station. I do know while at an NAB convention several years back, there was a guy asking at the sessions if there were any pirate stations operating. He was making a list of them to turn into the FCC. So even if the pirate is not causing interference, there are those that do not want it operating. Patrick ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
