I assume that KPWX's tx is south of Portland and that they want to reach 
Portland's Mexican community so I don't think changing patterns is going to 
happen, however, what CKWX should be pressing for is for somewhat lower CH 
power for KPWX. This morning and afternoon QRM is only going to get worse as 
fall continues and northern areas start to develop skip a couple hours before 
SS and after SR.

.. neilkaz ..


-----Original Message-----
>From: Patrick Martin <[email protected]>
>Sent: Oct 4, 2010 3:03 AM
>To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of
>       America <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [IRCA] Re 1130 BC & OR
>
>Bruce,
>
>Maybe CKWX should look at another frequency, maybe the old 600?
>Especialy if they could get 50 KW. Unless Mt. Angel drastically changes
>its' pattern or lowers power, it looks like CKWX will have to deal with
>the QRM. Of course a booster station or a translator on FM in the
>Frasier Valley may work. If CKWX has an FM, they could similcast in the
>mornings and afternoons. Of course combatting the U.S. QRM, maybe higher
>power might be allowed, but I believe Canada also has the 50 KW limit. 
>
>73,
>
>Patrick  
>
>Patrick Martin
>Seaside OR 
>KGED QSL Manager
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
>contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
>editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: [email protected]
>

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to