Not sure it was a whole lot better here this morning, but I did spend longer at it, and it's surprising how many that faded into weak audibility over time. In addition, the big guns faded up to greater strength, but one had to be there to hear them at that strength, as most didn't last long.
Listening was from 1400 to just after 1430UT. pretty darn good audio (all of it understandable by a native speaker, at least briefly): 594 JOAK 747 JOIB 774 JOUB 828 JOBB 1566 HLAZ at 1409 reasonable audio at times during the period (much of it understandable by a native speaker, though often battling w/splash or noise): 567 JOIK later on 603 HLSA //558 972 HLCA 1287 JOHR not so reasonable audio, occasional words or phrases in splash or noise could be understood by a native speaker 639 CC talk //4460, so CNR-1 873 JOGB //828 936 mx at 1412, presumed Anhui Burbles in the splatter and noise (if lucky, language might be guessed at by cadence of talk, or parallel established by changes in talk or music) : 558 HLQH //603 612 DU EE inflected talk at 1420UT; 4QR? 657 growly talk likely N. Korea 702 sounded like EE talk at 1433, so 2NR? 846 woman talking seemed //594 at 1415UT, so JOCP and/or synchros? 1017 not NHK2; CRI? 1044 CRI? 1053 woman talking, so JOAR? 1134 not sure 1143 seemed //738 (which didn't seem to have the noise that Gary has noted?) at 1416UT; so Taiwan Fisheries 1242 cuckoo clock pips at 1400 so JOLF 1269 JJ inflected talk at 1423, similar to JOHR-1287 a minute or so earlier 1323 CRI? 1557 likely Taiwan's Family Radio 1593 seemed //4460 at 1433UT, so CNR1, but pretty sure NHK2 mx there also Strongish het, no audio (either undermodulated or ravaged by splatter): 1098DU; 1476,and many others at various times best wishes, Nick ***************************** Nick Hall-Patch Victoria, BC Canada _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
