Saul DX wrote:
Thanks, Scott. I was wondering about this. So would this truly
constitute a new station / new log in your opinion?
We're deep into judgment call territory here.
On the one hand, the move from Chambersburg to Maugansville is fairly
short in distance - about 14.75 km, if I have the coordinates of both
sites correctly. And the move increased WHGT's day power, making it less
of a challenge to receive.
On the other hand, the move took WHGT across a state line, at least as
far as COL is concerned (the new tx site remains in Pennsylvania), and
if WHGT was operating with its new 58-watt night power (which sounds
unlikely), that would be a much greater DX challenge than its old
1000-watt night facility.
I don't think *I* would count it as a new station. Your mileage may vary.
s
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its
editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: [email protected]
