Carrier was noted still 0530 UTC bur don't know if from same station. Checked 4845 evening & hard to be positive with WWCR on 4840, but 4845 seemed not there. There were over 60 TA carriers last night but only a few had audio. Thanks. 73, George S., MN
From: Nick Hall-Patch <[email protected]> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 11:53 PM Subject: Re: [IRCA] MN TA audio 0n 783 at 0215 UTC who? 1215.0000 and 1268.9992 are the carriers heard here at 0430UT; 1215 is the beefier but still quite weak. 782.9998 shows an occasional trace here, George, but only using Spectran to "see" it. I believe your times are too early for Mauritania (can any east coaster verify its sign on time? EMWG says 0830UT, //4845, and s/off is given as 0100UT), but the carrier might be there a lot earlier. Can you figure out what time it starts to fade out? That might give you an idea of where the transmitter could be. best wishes, Nick At 03:23 13-10-11, you wrote: >Here in Victoria, I can see 1215 with a weak carrier. Nothing else on the >frequencies below.....Walt > >On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:29 AM, George Sherman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Lots of splash from WBBM, even in USB. Definite talking. Might it be > > anything that has a parallel? Also weak audio on 549 & not sure if I detect > > threshold audio on 747. Carriers on 621, 1008, 999, 1206, 1215, > 1251, 1278 & > > many more, most just weak or weaker. R&% & 8" Quantum loop. Thanks for any > > thoughts on what 783 might be. > > _______________________________________________ > > IRCA mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > > > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the > > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the > > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers > > > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > > > > To Post a message: [email protected] > > > > >_______________________________________________ >IRCA mailing list >[email protected] >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the >original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of >the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers > >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > >To Post a message: [email protected] _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected] _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
