I can't get them in IL past WBBM which is practically in my back yard, but from 
WI, as of early Sep, I haven't noted them to be as good the past two seasons as 
during the prior two. Perhaps a recent upgrade? 73 KAZ


-----Original Message-----
>From: Sylvain Naud <[email protected]>
>Sent: Oct 19, 2011 7:18 PM
>To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America 
><[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [IRCA] Mauritania on 783 in Victoria
>
>Personally, I don't recall having heard them on such a regular basis and 
>with a crisp audio as it is now so this may be a possibility. I searched 
>on the web to find something related in both English and French but I 
>came out empty.
>
>Sylvain
>Portneuf, QC
>
>Le 2011-10-19 11:56, Nick Hall-Patch a écrit :
>> I wonder if they've upgraded or serviced their transmitter in some 
>> way?  This is the first season that they've even shown a hint of audio 
>> here, but of course conditions change from season to season also.
>>
>> best wishes,
>>
>> Nick
>>
>>
>> At 13:13 19-10-11, you wrote:
>>> RE:
>>>
>>> I've been following 783, presumed Mauritania for the last 90 minutes 
>>> or so,
>>> and it's there again at almost the same level as last night.  The first
>>> hour, just a weak carrier on the Perseus SDR waterfall, but now 
>>> (05:08 UTC),
>>> it's a decent carrier again.  Not quite as strong as last night, 
>>> where I'm
>>> sure there were snippets of audio heard.  Nothing so far from the SW 
>>> outlet
>>> of 7245, which has a highly variable s/on time........Walt
>>>
>>>
>>> >>>>> Hello Walt,
>>>
>>>
>>> Mauritania on 783 has been making more numerous appearances lately 
>>> with much stronger signals even here lately as well.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Allen Willie
>>> Bristol's Hope, Newfoundland
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> IRCA mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>>
>>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
>>> the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>>
>>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>>
>>> To Post a message: [email protected]
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
>> the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>> To Post a message: [email protected]
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
>contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
>editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: [email protected]
>


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to