Finally got to check another recording Walt, from a week earlier, 12
November. At 1500UT, 1575kHz almost seemed to have more carriers
than stations listed in PAL..
1574.9383
1574.9816
1574.9898
1574.9944
1574.9983
1574.9991
1574.9999
1575.0002
1575.0007
1575.0014
1575.0030
1575.0328
Probably about .3Hz error due to Doppler smearing, so I think your
Perseus is set pretty accurately. Strongest were .9944 (VoA likely)
and .0002, with .9816 a close contender (and that one signed off at
1500UT as well; nothing listed in PAL). Quite a mess...wonder if
one of those was Farda which is supposed to be spot on channel, and
in darkness at that time.
best wishes,
Nick
At 04:21 21-11-11, you wrote:
Nick, those carriers were measured around 15:00 UTC. What, VOA not bang
on? Interesting!........Walt
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Nick Hall-Patch <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mauno Ritola noted the following on this list 4 October 2011:
>
> Hi Nick,
>> you are right, VOA has drifted 2 Hz down to 1575.995 kHz. Farda UAE is
>> right on 1575.000 kHz. Iran 1575.022 kHz.
>> Bubble jammer 1574.24 kHz. Plus about a dozen of UNID carriers.
>>
>> 73, Mauno
>>
>
> I'm not at home right now, so am depending on SDR recordings from 18
> November, Walt, but I believe that VoA is now 1574.9940 (which you noted,
> and was the strongest signal here), while the other major signal on the
> recording I have is 1574.9389 (likely your .941) which is definitely unID.
> The others were too weak on that date to really note (maybe one on
> 1574.9995...). What time did you hear all those carriers?
>
> best wishes,
>
> Nick
>
>
> At 15:18 19-11-11, you wrote:
>
>> 1575: 6. I've noticed this one to have a wide peak for the last few
>> days,
>> so zoomed in with my Perseus. A real hodge podge of signals on 1574.921,
>> .941, .994, .998, .999, and 1575.003. Nick could probably elaborate more
>> with his superior set-up to measure the various carriers.
>> 1593: 7 level CNR1
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its
editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: [email protected]