The daytime signals between the two are nearly the same.. both at 10KW...
1600's tower is just slightly further south, where it looks like it's a bit
more populated.

Where they will gain is the 27W on 1550 vs 175W on 1600 at night.. that
night power will serve more people.



On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Tim Tromp <[email protected]> wrote:

> Finally, after chasing this for three hours tonight, a solid ID from
> KIVA at 0558 UTC with literally two minutes to spare before their switch
> to 1600 KHz at 0600 UTC.  At 0558 UTC an announcer gave what sounded
> like an unscripted and possibly live announcement: "Alright everybody
> this is 1550 KIVA, soon to become in two minutes 1600 KIVA..." and cited
> the move due to having "tremendous growth during the last nine months
> and now is a great opportunity for us to move to a much bigger signal.."
> and thanked listeners and invited them to rockoftalk.com  What a way to
> log a new one!  Thanks to KAZ for the alert last week, it paid off
> tonight.  The time wasn't all wasted either as 1550 KDCC Dodge City, KS.
> (1kw/90w) was also heard for the first time.
>
> 73,
> Tim Tromp
> West Michigan
> Perseus SDR + Phased BOGs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: [email protected]
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to