No trace of anything on 1279 has ever been noted on any antenna or any Perseus recording. 73 KAZ 35 miles NW of Chicago
-----Original Message----- >From: Tim Tromp <[email protected]> >Sent: Sep 22, 2012 5:01 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [IRCA] 1279 off-frequency mystery > >Scanning my Perseus SSS recording from UTC Sep.21st,2012 @ 0200 UTC, I >see no 1 KHz offset carrier on 1280. WNAM is spot-on. > >Tim Tromp >West Michigan > >On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 10:40 -0700, Glenn Hauser wrote: >> UNIDENTIFIED. 1279, Sept 21 at 0537 UT, once again for third time a weak >> off-frequency carrier making a 1-kHz het with 1280 stations. Loops NE/SW. >> I`ve yet to see any other reports of this. Based solely on approx. direxion, >> proximity, some possibilities: >> >> WBIG Aurora IL >> WGBF Evansville IN >> KCOB Newton IA >> WFYC Alma MI >> WWTC Minneapolis MN >> KDKD Clinton MO >> KYRO Troy MO >> WONW Defiance OH >> KSLI Abilene TX >> KMFR Pearsall TX >> WGLR Lancaster WI >> WNAM Neenah-Menasha WI >> CFMB Montreal QC [far, but 50 kW] >> XEBQ Chihuahua Chih >> >> If not at night when I hear this, people within daytime range could check >> these out. Of course it could also be one of those top-secret US government >> tests. It`s not my semi-local KSOK Ark City KS, confirmed at 1525 UT Sept 21 >> as on-frequency (Glenn Hauser, Enid OK, DX LISTENING DIGEST) > > >_______________________________________________ >IRCA mailing list >[email protected] >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original >contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its >editors, publishing staff, or officers > >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > >To Post a message: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
