The problem with this - which I'm sure you will appreciate - is the cost for 
the equipment and licensing.
My WAG would be that this factor would cause 60-70% of all currently licensed 
AM stations to have
to choose between remaining analog anyway or turning in their license. I don't 
think that's a situation 
anyone wants.


 
Russ Edmunds
15 mi NNW of Philadelphia 
Grid FN20id
<[email protected]>





________________________________
 From: Dave Marthouse <[email protected]>
To: 'Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America' 
<[email protected]> 
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] article on IBOC
 

    I am about 250 miles give or take from WBT's transmitter.  I heard
them switch from analog to digital on the Saturday morning of the test
weekend.  When the digital started I checked adjacent frequencies and didn't
hear any digital hash.  I am going to assume that the digital signal was
confined to the standard 10KC channel when it was on the main channel during
the test.  The sky wave signal wasn't that great at the time.  I admit this
is strictly anecdotal and no measuring instruments were used other than my
ears.  I couldn't decode the digital signal as I have no IBOC receiving
equipment.  

If eventually broadcasting does go all digital it would make more sense to
me to put it on the main channel and scrap analog but do this after a long
sun set period for the analog technology.


Dave Marthouse
[email protected]


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to