Slightly AU cx really aren't of much use. Aiming west here as I do now, 
somewhat AU cx can be of use as a few things in MN,MB,ND,SK,AB can be knocked 
down and sometimes out, while leaving things from CO/KS and further south 
coming in just fine with no attenuation and less QRM than normal.

Since I am home for once (will be away much of the time til Xmas) I'll put out 
my cables and cords for tonight's SSS to the west.

Saul, I think you have room for this array?  
http://www.wellbrook.uk.com/pdf/PhasedArrayReportMay2008.pdf

73 KAZ Barrington IL


-----Original Message-----
>From: Chernos Saul <[email protected]>
>Sent: Oct 23, 2013 1:28 PM
>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [IRCA] DX tonight > Burnt River ON
>
>Hi Mark (et al),
>Thanks for comments. Fully agree, cx way less than stellar, almost painfully 
>normal. Woke up at 4 am and had presumed Mexicans on 1140 and 1210, both weak, 
>with some audio taken for possible identification. Sunset was a let-down - 
>nice ID on 1030 KCTA Corpus Christi TX, which is a regular here, but I have 
>since slightly regretted staying up from that point on.
>Last night's Au cx were more like an A/K of 5/1, 5/2 ... and I usually find 
>levels like those to be a DX killer rather than seriously enhancing anything 
>from the south or knocking down my semi-locals.
>I'm using a wellbrook loop outdoors. The wire is in triangle formation and 
>pointed kind of ne-sw. Not sure I want to change directions. It's a new system 
>here. It has pulled in some good stuff, a few good new catches - but it's not 
>as directional as I expected (which has benefits as well as drawbacks: It 
>handles enhancement when directions vary as time progresses, but I can do 
>better in a few situations by simply turning my ultralight Tecsun.
>Saul
>Burnt River ON
>
>
>
>> To: [email protected]
>> From: [email protected]
>> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 14:07:27 -0400
>> Subject: [IRCA]  DX tonight > Burnt River ON
>> 
>> On this end:
>> Quite a few TA's but nothing rare.
>> 
>> Saul, your 1215.06 likely one of the Spain synchro's; Absolute UK is 
>> typically "spot on".  UK and Spain often swap channel dominance here 
>> over a short time interval.
>> 
>> Your other channels as noted here at 7 p.m. EDT / 2300 UTC Tuesday:
>> 1000 = RCN Colombia with mucho WINS IBOC
>> 1510 = WUFC Boston way over probable WLAC
>> 840 = WHAS + Cuba duke-out
>> 940 = WIPR San Juan, PR big signal way over whatever was second,
>> typically WINZ Miami
>> 
>> None of the above even gets close to "unusual".  Skip Arey on Facebook 
>> mention big-time solar activity but nothing on medium-wave seemed 
>> particularly auroral ... yet.  If I'm running my Latin American 
>> SuperLoop antenna (cardioid pattern, null 350 deg.), quite a few lower 
>> band channels have a Latin American / Caribbean dominant station 
>> whether conditions are auroral or not.  It helps that the shortest 
>> distance from here to salt water, a bit less than 3 miles, is due south.
>> 
>> Mark Connelly, WA1ION
>> South Yarmouth, MA
>> 
>> <<
>> TAs are moderate. Hets seemed strong before sunset, but didn't evolve 
>> into too
>> much. Had a carrier on 1215.06 or thereabouts.
>> 
>> 1000 in Instant Parma OH and 1510 ESPD in WI seem on late. Go get 'em. 
>> Pests
>> here.
>> 
>> 840 NE, 940 IA among IDed catches, a few more need some web checks.
>> 
>> Nothing too exciting...
>> 
>> Saul Chernos
>> Burnt River ON
>> >>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>> 
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>> 
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>> 
>> To Post a message: [email protected]
>> 
>                                         
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
>contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
>editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: [email protected]
>

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to