Hello All,
Asian signals rebounded quite well here from yesterday's dreary session, with
several low and high band TP's showing some energy from 1430-1510.
My session started off at 1430 in the frozen back yard, with 1566-HLAZ the
strongest of the Asians (very good) along with 1575-VOA (fair) and 1593-CNR1
(good) in and out of the domestic splatter. Around 1445 the usual mix of
603-HLSA and China rose up to a good level on the low band, with Chinese female
speech almost at equal level with HLSA's long-set music. These two continued to
fight it out until the 1500 TOH, with 603-China talking right through HLSA's 3
+ 1 time pips. Other low band Asians showed up around 1515 during sunrise
enhancement, with 639-CNR1 (fair), 648-VOR (poor) and 657-Pyongyang (good) in
and out of the domestic splatter until around 1530, when they started to bail.
The high band never received any sunrise enhancement boost at all here, with
1566-HLAZ, 1575-VOA and 1593-CNR1 all down in the noise by 1520. The
603-HLSA-China mix continued until around 1540 at a fairly weak level, with
China finally on top as the two slid into the noise. Overall it was a pr!
etty interesting session, mainly because of the fairly vibrant low and high
band Asians around 1500.
603 China (Hulun Buir?) + 603 HLSA (Namyang, S. Korea)
Good level mix at 1458 with female Chinese speech often
at a competitive level with HLSA's music; Chinese speech
continuing through HLSA's 3 + 1 pips at the 1500 TOH
http://www.mediafire.com/listen/33p5n2pdrlgnxqx/603-HLSA-China-mix-1458z020414SWP.MP3
1593 CNR1 Changzhou, China Fair-good Chinese speech
through 1590-Seattle splatter at 1452
http://www.mediafire.com/listen/ay2pyjnr56zovv9/1593-CNR1-1452z020414SWP.MP3
73 and Good DX,
Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
C.Crane SWP 7.5" Slider loopstick Ultralight +
12" Experimental FSL antenna
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its
editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: [email protected]
