Hello All,
 
A fairly good sunrise enhancement session from 1440-1515 here this morning 
featured the low band Asians, with 594-JOAK briefly reaching its best audio of 
the entire season around 1507.
 
As usual the band was practically comatose around 1430, with only occasional 
poor audio from 594-JOAK and 1593-CNR1. Nothing much changed until around 1455, 
when the increasing daylight boosted up 594-JOAK dramatically, and also brought 
603-HLSA (free of China) up out of the noise to reach a fair level with its 3 + 
1 pips at the 1500 TOH. 657-Pyongyang also came out of the noise to reach a 
fair level at this time, and 639-CNR1 was in and out with threshold audio 
around 1512. Joining these low band TP's were 972-HLCA and 1134-KBS, both in 
and out with fair audio around 1515. The high band received no sunrise boost at 
all here, and the previously fair signal from 1593-CNR1 (around 1450) was long 
gone by 1510. None of the high band regulars had any audio at all by that time, 
with anemic signals from 1566-HLAZ and 1575-VOA having bailed around 1505. On 
the other hand 594-JOAK's signal at 1507 was impressive indeed, hitting an 
excellent peak briefly to record its strongest audio !
 of the entire season.
 
594  JOAK  Tokyo, Japan   Excellent level Japanese news
            briefly at 1507, its strongest audio of the entire season here
            
http://www.mediafire.com/listen/i9ujvcqvo9cdbcm/594-JOAK-1507z020814SWP.MP3
 
603  HLSA  Namyang, S. Korea   Fair level interval music,
            female KBS ID and 3 + 1 time pips at 1500 TOH;
            no sign of usual Chinese co-channel
            
http://www.mediafire.com/listen/ngqjtz8wzfbuk35/603-HLSA-1459z020814SWP.MP3 

73 and Good DX,
Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
C.Crane SWP 7.5" Slider loopstick Ultralight +
12" Experimental FSL antenna (in the frozen back yard)


           


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to