Finally checked KFNQ out on the upstairs HD radio. The HD decodes, but really, it sounds no better than their AM did before they introduced IBOC noise to it. Granted, it sounds much quieter than it does on analog, but only because of the contrast from the hash now mixed with the analog signal. How absurd! -- Rick ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Martin" <mwd...@webtv.net> To: "IRCA" <irca@hard-core-dx.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 9:56 AM Subject: Re: [IRCA] Seattle's 1090 Now Using IBOC
As Gomer Pyle would say "Surprise..surprise..surprise". KFNQ is indeed IBOC. I can hear the sidebands as of this morning. No doubts about it! Not a big problem here, but it is there. 73, Patrick Patrick Martin Seaside OR KGED QSL Manager > From: mwd...@webtv.net > To: irca@hard-core-dx.com > Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 01:25:42 -0700 > Subject: Re: [IRCA] Seattle's 1090 Now Using IBOC > > Were they testing, or is it a Daytime thing? I just tried here on the > Northern OR coast, 110 miles from KFNQ, and I get no IBOC hash. I get a > bit on 1080, off the SW EWE, but I presume that from KNX, but nothing > noted otherwise. KFNQ in quite strong here off the NE EWE too. No hash on > 1100 either. But at least no sign of any hash now. I will try tomorrow > during the day. Strange that any new IBOCers on AM. Who is listening to > IBOC on AM? > > 73, > > Patrick > > Patrick Martin > Seaside OR > KGED QSL Manager > > > From: rick...@shellworld.net > > To: irca@hard-core-dx.com > > Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:33:29 -0700 > > Subject: [IRCA] Seattle's 1090 Now Using IBOC > > > > I may be late to this party, but noticed yesterday that KFNQ-1090 in > > Seattle > > is now running IBOC. Not too surprising, since it's owned by CBS. > > Years ago I used to see them on IBOC lists but never heard the slightest > > hint of hash. > > Now 1080 and 1100 may be history here. > > Noted them with IBOC yesterday. > > I don't often visit that part of the dial, so don't know when they began > > using it, but it should easily decode on an HD radio here. > > -- > > Rick Lewis > > > > _______________________________________________ > > IRCA mailing list > > IRCA@hard-core-dx.com > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > > > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the > > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the > > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers > > > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > > > > To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > IRCA mailing list > IRCA@hard-core-dx.com > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > > To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com > _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com
