What about all of the audio recordindgs? It would be nice to have audio clips to go with the QSL cards.
Thanks [email protected] On Mar 16, 2014, at 1:55 AM, Patrick Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > Mike, > > That is not a bad idea. I think there is a couple in Oregon and WA too. The > collections would be scattered, but still people would be able to view the > QSLs. I hate to think about my relatives just tossing them in the trash. > > Patrick Martin > Seaside OR > KGED QSL Manager > >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 20:52:30 -0700 >> Subject: Re: [IRCA] QSL archival -was- Re: [NRC-AM] More on mergers >> >> There are various Broadcasting and radio museums around the country such as >> Pavek in Minnesota, and Museum of TV and Radio in California and New York. >> Bob Wien says that there is a nice one near him in Maryland. Perhaps we >> could talk to some of these places and petition them to start amassing qsl >> collections. --Mike >> >>> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 15:49:31 -0400 >>> From: [email protected] >>> To: [email protected] >>> CC: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [IRCA] QSL archival -was- Re: [NRC-AM] More on mergers >>> >>> My children and grandchildren won't want my small QSL collection (around >>> 900 stations). It's a mix of MW (400+), FM (40+), SWBC (250+) and utility >>> stations (225+). I still collect QSLs so the collection will grow. Probably >>> only a few "rare" ones in there. I do scan them all in so that I have >>> duplication in case the originals are lost. >>> >>> I would be interested in an alternative location to donate them in the >>> future but I would also like to see collections on-line from the early >>> years to present. It's great that there is an archive but I'm in CA and >>> will probably never go to MD to see the collection that they have. >>> >>> Martin Foltz >>> Mission Viejo CA >>> >>>> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 12:07:25 +0000 >>>> From: <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected], [email protected] >>>> Subject: [IRCA] QSL archival -was- Re: [NRC-AM] More on mergers >>>> Message-ID: <20140315120725.XEMIS.109129.root@cdptpa-web15> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >>>> >>>> I'd like to start a thread about verification archival, if I may, >>>> which I suppose is somewhat distantly related to the merger thread. >>>> I was around in the 1960's and actually still have some of the >>>> material that circulated by mail back then. But that's not why >>>> I write now. >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> IRCA mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca >>> >>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the >>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the >>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers >>> >>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org >>> >>> To Post a message: [email protected] >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> IRCA mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca >> >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the >> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the >> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers >> >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org >> >> To Post a message: [email protected] >> > > _______________________________________________ > IRCA mailing list > [email protected] > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original > contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its > editors, publishing staff, or officers > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > > To Post a message: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
