Hello All,
 
Asian signals were fairly average here this morning with the exception of the 
low band Japanese, who once again went on a vibrant romp, powered by a sunrise 
enhancement boost around 1345.
 
At the 1310 start of the session the usual regulars were in and out with fair 
audio, including 594-JOAK, 693-JOAB, 972-HLCA and 1566-HLAZ. Like yesterday 
nothing much changed until the first sign of daylight around 1335, which caused 
almost all of the low band Japanese to start to come out of the noise. By 1345 
the strange band had audio from 531-JOQG (fair to good), 567-JOIK (fair in KVI 
splatter), 585-JOPG (good), 594-JOAK (very good to excellent) and 693-JOAB 
(very good). The low band daylight boost didn't seem to apply for the Asia 
mainland stations, though, as only 603-HLSA and 657-Pyongyang made weak 
appearances this morning, and both of them were anemic at best. After 1345 the 
high band featured 1377-CNR1 (fair at 1350), 1503-JOUK (good at 1353), 
1566-HLAZ (good at 1348) and 1595-CNR1 (fair at 1402). As is typical lately, 
all of the Asians seemed to fall off of a cliff around 1410, with 594-JOAK the 
last survivor. Strongest signal of the morning was from 594-JOAK at 1!
 350, with a bizarre radio drama audible on five different NHK1 stations at the 
time (531, 567, 585, 594 and 1503). In this location that usually favors the 
Asian mainland over Japan, such a collection of low band Japanese is very 
unusual, even in the Fall Season.
 
594  JOAK  Tokyo, Japan   Bizarre radio drama at 1350 with
                fast-talking male voices; best signal of the session
                
http://www.mediafire.com/listen/5sjyfxayccc4m42/594-JOAK-1350z032214SWP.MP3

73 and Good DX,
Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
C.Crane SWP 7.5" Slider loopstick Ultralight +
12" Experimental FSL antenna




            

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to