Many of the AM on FM translators result from the minute nighttime or even 
Critical Hours powers
permissible for AM's which used to be daytimers. So in one sense this is the 
FCC's way of sort
of fixing that mistake.

I would agree with Paul's statement re LPFM's subject to his emphasized 
condition. In reality
that condition isn't always met.

My earlier comment has more to do with the interference which existing FM's 
would cause for
a lot of these LPFM's, which is a valid but separate issue, and many of these 
recently granted
run powers quite a bit lower than stated below. IMHO, LPFM's have become a fad 
for a lot of
public entities and religious and civic groups. I've seen some numbers which 
suggest that many
are active for only a couple of years. After all, even with LPFM's, after a 
while you need to have
listeners.


Russ Edmunds
15 mi NNW of Philadelphia  
Grid FN20id
<[email protected]>



--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 4/9/14, Paul B. Walker, Jr. <[email protected]> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [IRCA] Of AM Translators and LPFM Stations
 To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" 
<[email protected]>
 Date: Wednesday, April 9, 2014, 7:51 PM
 
 LPFMs and translators are two
 different things.
 
 LPFMs are 100 watt community stations and they are non
 commercial, so an AM
 station can't get one.
 
 A translator is a commercial 250 Watt signal meant to
 rebroadcast an AM or
 Fm station but can't originate it's own programming.
 
 Increase power to overcome noise? Seriously? That will just
 create more
 interference and raise the noise floor.
 
 LPFM's and translators BOTH have a well defined and well
 served purpose..
 WHEN USED LEGALLY AND PROPERLY, AS INTENDED.
 
 LPFM's are great for those genres/ethnicities/communities
 who feel they are
 underserved. Translators are great for those commercial
 stations, AM or
 FM.. who feel they need to fill in a hole in their coverage
 area.
 
 Signed,
 A Broadcaster of 10 years
 Paul Walker
 
 
 On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:24 PM, <[email protected]>
 wrote:
 
 > I don't see what they are fixing by adding LPFM
 stations. The AM band will
 > remain the same. The addition of a LPFM station will
 keep more AM stations
 > on the air that would go out of business. You're right
 Les, the FM band
 > will suffer. I think the fix for AM is to increase
 powers to overcome
 > noise, get rid of IBOC and figure out a way to reduce
 the number of
 > stations. Stations will need to have programming that
 attracts listeners
 > and make it available on the Internet and Phones.
 Eventually Internet and
 > Phones will dominate and they can turn off their AM
 station. Remember, a
 > radio station is in business to make money by
 advertising during
 > programming that has an audience. AM radio is one of
 the ways to deliver
 > their programming and it might not be their best long
 term mode of delivery.
 >
 > I'm with my grandkids and my grandson just asked me if
 I brought my radio.
 > He pointed to his Tablet and said this is what we use
 for entertainment now.
 >
 > Martin
 >
 > > Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 15:43:20 -0500
 > > From: Les Rayburn <[email protected]>
 > > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, 
       "[email protected]"
 > >       <[email protected]>, 
       "[email protected]"
 <
 > [email protected]>
 > > Subject: [IRCA] Of AM Translators and LPFM
 Stations
 > > Message-ID: <[email protected]>
 > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
 format=flowed
 > >
 > > Like many AM DX'ers I've been following the recent
 FCC filing period
 > > concerning the future of AM Radio with great
 interest. One band-aid
 > > solution that seems to have great favor with
 broadcasters is that of
 > > allowing stations to apply for FM translators to
 cover their primary
 > > service area, especially at night.
 > >
 > > The economic advantages of that are obvious, but I
 really wonder where
 > > all this spectrum is going to come from. I live
 just outside of a small
 > > city, Birmingham, and last Christmas I had a very
 difficult time finding
 > > a clear spot where I could broadcast my Christmas
 lights display music.
 > > This due to the addition of a couple of new
 translators and a LPFM
 > station.
 > >
 > > I've been reading that we have a new LPFM coming
 on the air this summer
 > > on 99.1 FM (www.aphradio.org). Most cities that I
 have visited in the US
 > > are in similar circumstances. I just don't see how
 many AM stations
 > > could add translators without the FM band quickly
 becoming a crowded
 > > mess like the AM band.
 > >
 > > What am I missing?
 > >
 > >
 > > --
 > > 73,
 > >
 > >
 > > Les Rayburn, N1LF
 > > Maylene, AL
 > > EM63
 >
 > _______________________________________________
 > IRCA mailing list
 > [email protected]
 > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
 >
 > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are
 those of the
 > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect
 the opinion of the
 > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
 >
 > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
 >
 > To Post a message: [email protected]
 >
 >
 _______________________________________________
 IRCA mailing list
 [email protected]
 http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
 
 Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are
 those of the original contributors and do not necessarily
 reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing
 staff, or officers
 
 For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
 
 To Post a message: [email protected]
 
 

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to