--- Begin Message ---

Hello All,
 
For those interested, a couple of Australian members of the Ultralight radio 
group have identified (and provided information) about the two 639 mystery 
stations recorded on MP3's during the last (exceptional) morning at Cape 
Perpetua.
 
Sam Dellit of the ADXC listened to the MP3 recording linked below and 
deciphered a "Coffs Harbour" mention at 1:40 into the recording-- identifying 
the commercial-type format as from the 5 kW station 639-2HC in Coffs Harbour, 
NSW.

 
http://www.mediafire.com/view/2xzvhhxb2g4rlx0/639-UnID-Aus-1338z082614PL380.MP3 
 

Identifying the other 639 station (running the ABC LR network) in the recording 
below was a little trickier. It had been noted as parallel to 891-5AN which 
runs the LR network, but there are two ABC LR network stations on 639-- a 10 kW 
transmitter in Port Pirie, South Australia and a 1 kW transmitter in Mossman, 
Queensland. Paul Philbrook of South Australia provided the critical information 
that there is a 30 minute time delay in ABC programming between the South 
Australia and Queensland states-- so that any 639 signal directly parallel to 
891-5AN must be the 10 kW station 5CK in Port Pirie, South Australia. Thus the 
identity of the LR network station dominant on 639 during the next recording 
was nailed down as 5CK.

http://www.mediafire.com/view/2v9c95naed95a5z/639-UnID-Aus-1342z082614PL380.MP3 
 

The third and final morning of the Cape Perpetua DXpedition had quite a few 
wild mixes of Australian stations like this on various frequencies-- so it's 
going to take some time before all the identities are nailed down. At least the 
Australian DXers have completely solved the 639 mysteries.

73 and Good DX,
Gary DeBock (back in Puyallup, WA)
7.5" loopstick Tecsun PL-380 Ultralight + 
15" DXpedition FSL antenna


   


--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to