If you have a Beverage in a S to SE direction you should certainly catch this 
eventually. All you have to do this season is to wait a few days for AU effects 
to come back. 

Re: Calgary 1060, is "not so funny 1060" still running day pattern at night? 
This makes them an easy catch here in IL when cx haven't been AU for a few days 
and NW stuff returns. KYW is nulled enough by DKAZ termination that it isn't an 
issue and while it can poke in weakly at times, in general I cannot tell that 
it is on the air. A 30 dB null is great, but a 40 dB+ null would be better and 
totally kill pests, but it is difficult to achieve that at night without 
phasing and even with phasing a null that deep of skywave signals isn't usually 
perfectly consistant.

73 KAZ

-----Original Message-----
>From: Nigel Pimblett <[email protected]>
>Sent: Dec 17, 2014 11:49 PM
>To: neilkaz <[email protected]>, Mailing list for the International Radio 
>Club of America <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] XERDO
>
>Thanks for the alert.  Here in Alberta, it is XEEP tonight (when it can 
>get past Calgary and a couple of others), but I do see a substantial 
>carrier on 1060.076, so I'm sure when conditions cooperate I'll be able 
>to catch them at some point.
>
>73,
>
>Nigel Pimblett
>
>On 17/12/2014 8:25 PM, neilkaz wrote:
>> Trivial to log XERDO again tonight with grupera mx and seemingly an ID after 
>> every song. "La Raza, Mil Sesenta, La Estacion de Todos."
>>
>> 73 KAZ Barrington IL Perseus and phased array of two DKAZ with the main beam 
>> steered roughly WSW. .. ie "Toto, I think we are back in Kansas." 1340 KGGS 
>> Garden City noted again etc.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Barry McLarnon <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Dec 17, 2014 12:50 PM
>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [NRC-AM] XERDO "La Raza" on 1060+
>>>
>>> On 12/17/2014 01:12 PM, neilkaz wrote:
>>>> For the past couple of nights I'd noted a signal on the high side of 1060 
>>>> in Spanish and since XEEP was also noted as usual and since KIJN had been 
>>>> noted running all night earlier in the season, I didn't pay any attention 
>>>> to it. Last night it was quite strong and certainly didn't sound like 
>>>> religious Spanish pgmg, and wasn't XEEP so I paid more attention to it. My 
>>>> Perseus measured the freq as 1060.076.
>>>>
>>>> At 0400 UTC I recorded a nice ID with calls and "La Raza" slogan and 7000 
>>>> watts mentioned and an address in Reynosa.
>>>>
>>>> There's some differences in where this is actually located shown on 
>>>> various sites, but this site says Reynosa. 
>>>> http://www.mpm.com.mx/?r=radio/view&id=9736003F-3B3B-A79A-8618-7CCA15F69578
>>>>
>>>> Anyhow, their move from 1450 licensed to Matamoros is complete and I 
>>>> expect this station to be widely heard.
>>>>
>>> I've also noticed this signal recently, producing a "hum" on the high
>>> side of KYW, which was being backgrounded by XEEP.  Two nights ago, I
>>> measured the carrier frequency to be 1060.0774.  Not much chance for
>>> audio given my local noise woes, but it's nice to know what it is anyway.
>>>
>>> Barry
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Barry McLarnon  Ottawa, ON
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Get you copy of the
>>> 35th Edition of the AM Radio Log
>>> http://www.nrcdxas.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>> To Post a message: [email protected]
>>
>

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to