Sorry for the typo. Chuck was correct. Reception was very good with many of them and easy to ID with identical formats. Only 50 watts. PAL was 100% accurate too. Perhaps I could email each site for verification! 73, Walt
On Thursday, January 22, 2015, Chuck Hutton <[email protected]> wrote: > Bet you meant 1669 for the round robin guys, right? > Chuck > > > Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 23:27:04 +0000 > > From: [email protected] <javascript:;> > > To: [email protected] <javascript:;> > > Subject: [IRCA] Another great TP day > > > > Had another wonderful session this morning with my highlight being the JJ > > weather transmissions on 1689! Like shooting fish in a barrel with site > > after site checking in. Also noted them on 1683.5 which isn't listed in > my > > PAL. All used USB + carrier only. 73, from Masset. Walt > > _______________________________________________ > > IRCA mailing list > > [email protected] <javascript:;> > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > > > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers > > > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > > > > To Post a message: [email protected] <javascript:;> > > > > _______________________________________________ > IRCA mailing list > [email protected] <javascript:;> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > > To Post a message: [email protected] <javascript:;> > > _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
