Hello All, 
  
Bill will almost certainly have another morning full of vibrant Asian 
recordings to sort out. The low band once again kicked into overdrive after a 
potent sunrise boost around 1440, boosting 603-HLSA to its best signals of the 
new year (excellent, during peaks), while 594, 693 and 747 all sounded very 
energetic during the same short period. 
  
Around 1400 the band didn't sound very special, with only an anemic 594-JOAK in 
audio. That changed pretty dramatically around 1430, with 603-HLSA rising out 
of the noise to reach very potent levels in and out-- easily becoming the 
strongest TP of the morning. Its parallel 558-HLQH also rode the same sunrise 
boost to fair signals, while 657-Pyongyang and a presumed 738-BEL2 had 
threshold audio in and out. The Japanese big guns on 594, 693 and 747 were in 
and out with very good peaks from 1430-1455, although the usual Korean regulars 
972-HLCA and 1134-KBS were missing in action. The high band also sounded dreary 
during the low band romp, with barely any audio at all from the regulars on 
1503, 1566, 1575 and 1593. Overall it was a strange session, with Asian 
propagation seriously skewed toward the lower frequencies. 603-HLSA was easily 
the star of the session, with Korean pop music ballads (hosted by the 
deep-voiced male) hitting excellent peaks around 1435. Hope to see Bill, Chuck, 
Bruce, Guy and the other TP-DXing fanatics at Bruce's GTG this afternoon, 
having plans to head for the Seattle TP-DXing planet (which sometimes seems 
like it's in a completely different universe). 
  
603  HLSA   Namyang, S. Korea   Korean pop music at a very good level at 1433; 
best Asian signal of the session 
http://www.mediafire.com/listen/8456kk2ey64xe82/603-HLSA-1433z022115CCSW.MP3    
  
73 and Good DX, 
Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA) 
7.5" loopstick C.Crane Skywave Ultralight + 
15" FSL antenna 
  
  
  
  
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to