Hello All, 
  
Yesterday's torrid Kiwi propagation didn't repeat for a second day, temporarily 
making Chuck, Tom and I wonder if the session might turn out to be somewhat of 
a letdown. But around 1300 the Cliff delivered interesting DX as usual, with 
several low-band Australians providing some excitement for those willing to 
track them down and check parallels. 
  
As we gathered at the deserted turnoff in total darkness at 1145 the hot topic 
of conversation was yesterday's awesome propagation, and how it played out in 
our individual results. Chuck had far more variety than I had noticed, with 
both Kiwis and Aussies unusually vibrant for him (especially the long-running 
ads from 1566-3NE, as in his posted recording). Tom also had been extremely 
impressed with the propagation, and we all hoped for something like a repeat 
this morning. At first listen on 531 kHz at 1146 it looked promising, with 
531-4KZ at an S7 level without any PI competition. Unfortunately the increasing 
daylight brought no repeat of yesterday's fantastic propagation, and we all 
wondered it the session might turn out to offer a routine mix of the Aussie and 
Kiwi big guns. Around 1300 the low-band propagation to Australia began to 
improve dramatically, however, and before long a mystery Oz station on 558 
began to take over the frequency. This was followed by an Aussie mix on 585, 
with both 7RN (// 576) and 2WEB (not // to 576 or 603) taking turns dominating 
the frequency. 531-4KZ also came up dramatically at this time, and 567-4JK 
started giving a weakened RNZ some serious competition. Chuck and Tom didn't 
seem aware of the Aussie low-band opening at the time (1300-1330) but after 
hearing about it soon started checking several frequencies. This was the first 
time I had ever received any Oz station on 558 at this cliff, and the first 
appearance of 585-2WEB here for a couple of years. This was also the first time 
that 585-7RN had been ID'ed by the 576 // at this cliff; a previous 585 
Australian recording had been determined to be 7RN after 2WEB's David Sharp (an 
Ultralight Radio Yahoo Group member) listened to it and said that the format 
didn't match that of 2WEB (there is no other real possibility on 585 from 
eastern Australia). 
  
531  4KZ  Innisfail, Australia   Good strength in the predawn darkness at 1146 
with local commercial ad string 
https://app.box.com/s/4cglto8uzff7zymehxiw0bkx8wha5rtl   
  
558  UnID-Australian   The primary mystery of the morning-- a fairly strong 
Australian station (not Fiji nor the American-accented Radio Sport) dominating 
with local ads at 1311. Any suggestions would be welcome! 
https://app.box.com/s/88afpevke1af7bffg0fy6ap6m1l8e2je    
  
558  UnID-Australian   Another recording of a mystery 558 station in Oz running 
an apparent talk program. Unknown whether this is the same station as linked 
above or not, but any identity suggestions would be welcome. 
https://app.box.com/s/n6qmnoclak9g7ontq4b1t4eb3fpnt187 
  
576  2RN  Sydney, Australia   RN network big gun playing jazz music at 1319; 
used to confirm reception of the 585-7RN // at 1322 
https://app.box.com/s/0qlp1ddc3z4erzyew26os74iid8awh3q   
  
585  7RN  Hobart, Australia   Tasmanian station playing jazz music // 576 at 
1322; only Tassie station to be received at the Cliff so far 
https://app.box.com/s/vuv7zubn9780zaszxyro8twk6eteo0ik   
  
585  2WEB   Bourke, Australia (presumed)   Playing "The Lion Sleeps Tonight" by 
the Tokens at fair strength over 7RN at 1320; not // to 576 nor 603, leaving no 
other real possibility (at least until Program Director David Sharp says 
otherwise :-) 
https://app.box.com/s/ux40moc0k3l3nohximyrix8bcsp6lq71   
  
73 and Good DX, 
Gary DeBock (DXing at the Rockwork 4 ocean cliff near Manzanita, OR) 
7.5" loopstick C.Crane Skywave Ultralight + 17" and 12" DXpedition FSL antennas 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
     
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to