The Japanese big guns were out in force this morning as Asian propagation 
continued to improve, with a generous sunrise enhancement boosting up the 
relatively obscure Taiwan station 738-BEL2 to its best level of the new season 
(fair). Despite this the usual Koreans on 558, 603, 657 and 972 seemed to be 
below average, with only 1053 and 1566 having much energy from that area.   
My session started at 1250 with the potent NHK signals described by Colin on 
594, 693, 747, 774 and 828 already at serious strength in the predawn darkness, 
along with the 1053-Jammer and 1566-HLAZ's Japanese program. Just after 1300 
the Taiwan station 738-BEL2 faded in at a threshold level with female-voiced 
Chinese news (in slight San Francisco splatter), and 1134-JOQR once again rode 
the Japanese propagation trend to a fair signal in Vancouver noise. Sunrise 
enhancement strengthened the Japanese even further, but the main action was on 
738, where BEL2 started to strengthen over the dying splatter to a fair level 
around 1333. Chinese male and female conversation was followed by pop music at 
a fairly decent level at 1335, as the station reached its best level of the new 
season by far. The Japanese big guns on 594, 693 and 747 finished out the 
session in a strong way by sticking around until 1400, by which time all the 
other Asians had long since bailed. Overall it was an excellent session for 
late September in a lean solar year, with 738-BEL2 managing its best signal 
since November.  
  
738  BEL2   Penghu, Taiwan   Male-female Chinese speech at fair level at 1335 
https://app.box.com/s/od0hn3bsp2gtu1dsigmo9q62ysxactev   
  
Chinese female pop music at fair to good level at 1338 
https://app.box.com/s/dl4jgwoinmdpk9tcja7vsjrgcoidsz2i   
  
73 and Good DX, 
Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA) 
7.5" loopstick C.Crane Skywave Ultralight + 
15" FSL antenna 
  
  
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to