As Colin and Nick have reported Asian signals were significantly improved this 
morning, with more energetic audio from both the big guns and second tier TP's. 
And Nick is quite correct about the signal from 594-JOAK-- it hit an S9+ level 
here just after 1400. 
  
At my 1315 start time the usual Japanese and Korean powerhouses were vibrant in 
the predawn darkness, with 594, 693, 747, 848 and 1566 all hitting good levels 
on peaks, and 972-HLCA and the 1053-Jammer not far behind. In addition the 
somewhat unusual 558-HLQH had a fair signal in and out through the 560 splatter 
around 1330, significantly stronger than its 603 //. A presumed 738-BEL2 had 
threshold audio in and out throughout the session, as did both 603-HLSA and 
657-Pyongyang, although none of these seemed to maintain energy for more than a 
few minutes at a time. After 1400 the already potent NHK big guns got a serious 
sunrise enhancement boost, and 594-JOAK, 693-JOAB and 747-JOIB all hit S9 
levels in and out until around 1410. The second tier Asians were nowhere near 
that strength, but 1044-CRI, 1134-JOQR and1323-CRI did manage weak audio just 
past 1400. 1566-HLAZ also had an unusually good signal throughout the session 
(very good on peaks), but the star performer this morning was 594-JOAK, hitting 
an S9+ level with Japanese male-announced NHK news at 1403. Overall the session 
was a clear improvement over yesterday, although it would have been more 
interesting with stronger audio on 558, 603, 657 and 738. At least there was 
fairly good variety in the Asian signals-- not always the case during this 
season of low expectations. 
  
594  JOAK   Tokyo, Japan   S9+ level Japanese NHK news at 1403-- best Asian 
signal of the session 
https://app.box.com/s/wz5yx65y9nhnhzm5rd5sw1gzlzal1npj   
  
73 and Good DX, 
Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA) 
7.5" loopstick C.Crane Skywave Ultralight + 
15" FSL antenna 
  
  
  
  
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to