This noise appears in both the upper sideband and lower sideband of 1500,
meaning it's not likely this is being generated from a station above or
below 1500.  From careful frequency measurements tonight under the Perseus
microscope, the mystery station's offset appears to be 1500.007 kHz - maybe
useful to those with calibrated SDRs who are chasing it down.

73,
Tim


On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Glenn Hauser via IRCA <
[email protected]> wrote:

> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: [email protected]
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Glenn Hauser <[email protected]>
> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <
> [email protected]>, " Jr.Paul B. Walker" <[email protected]
> >
> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 04:38:47 +0000 (UTC)
> Subject: Re: 1500 Mystery Station
> I`ve not noticed any IBOC from WLAC for years.
> http://topazdesigns.com/iboc/station-list.html
> says it went off in 2009.
>
> I`m sure Tom means the peak at 170 degrees, not the null.
>
> 73, Glenn Hauser
>
> --------------------------------------------
> On Tue, 2/9/16, Paul B. Walker, Jr. <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  Could this all be some
>  artifact or after affect of WLAC 1510 running HD?
>  Paul
>
>  On Monday,
>  February 8, 2016,  <[email protected]>
>  wrote:
>  My null on that 1500khz mystery
>  station with the noise is
>
>  approx. 170 degrees from Joliet, IL, slightly east of
>
>  south.
>
>
>
>  Tom Jasinski
>
>  Joliet,  IL
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to