As a practical matter, that 'solution' wouldn't really help anybody because it doesn't alter the facts of propagation. Whatever new stations were added to the current 1_A frequencies would - as many of their predecessors have - suffer significant interference from the higher powered stations.
Russ Edmunds 15 mi NW Phila Grid FN20id <[email protected]> AM: Modified Sony ICF2010's (2) barefoot w/whip FM: Yamaha T-80 & T-85, each w/ Conrad RDS Decoder; Onkyo T-450RDS; Tecsun PL-310 ( 2); modified Sony ICF2010 w/APS9B @ 15'; Grundig G8 w/whip; modified Sony ICF2010 w/whip On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Paul B. Walker, Jr. < [email protected]> wrote: > Here's my response: > > I’m all for the changes… And I’m a DXer and broadcaster!! > > Who cares about WGY in Boston or Pittsburgh? Who cares about KDKA in > Cincinatti or NYC? > > Reduce Class A Statiobs protection down from 750 miles to 300 miles and be > done with it. Most people, if they really wanna listen to WGY or KDKA from > far away listen online. > > The only people this 750 mile rule really help are DXers and the few > distant distant listeners who don’t have Internet. > > Why service a few at the sacrifice and cost of many? Allow small stations > night power or more night power to provide local programming > > > Paul > > On Friday, February 26, 2016, Dr. Tom Gruis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > My comments on the KXEL petition: > > > > > > > > Response to KXEL petition - 02.26.2014. > > > > > > > > In addition to the above, I submit that in a national emergency the high > > power stations would provide needed dissemination of information within > its > > day and night coverage areas and provide redundancy should that be > needed! > > Low power and FM stations would be much less capable of providing the > > public's interest, convenience, and necessity. Further, with the > heightened > > concerns about national security to limit available, operating, and > viable > > communications systems operating within the law seems at best foolhardy! > In > > terms of rapid emergency or even, God forbid, catastrophic periods the > high > > power stations would be a more immediate and possibly coordinated > > communications facility. Many ground stations would be much more > difficult > > to sabotage than concentrated systems such as cable and satellites. And > > remember the proven reliability and simplicity of the A. M. systems and > > wireless communications in general. > > > > > > > > Tom E. H. Gruis, Ed. D. > > > > K0HTF > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > IRCA mailing list > > [email protected] <javascript:;> > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > > > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the > > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the > > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers > > > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > > > > To Post a message: [email protected] <javascript:;> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > IRCA mailing list > [email protected] > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > > To Post a message: [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
