As Colin and Walt have reported the Asians were humming this morning, with a 
diverse collection of Chinese stations joining the Japanese and Korean big guns 
from 1330-1430. Chinese mid-band stations were especially numerous, while 
738-BEL2 had its most energetic signals of the season around 1415 (hitting very 
good peaks until 1430). 

It was obvious at my 1330 start time that Asian propagation had improved 
dramatically, with both 1206-CRI's Korean service and 1323-CRI's Russian 
service getting through the domestic splatter quite well (almost unheard of for 
1206-Yanbian here, only 4 kHz away from a horrendous Spanish pest on 1210). 936 
was managing weak Chinese audio, and other Chinese stations on 1017, 1035 and 
1044 were in and out of the noise. Around 1350 the second-tier regulars on 603 
(HLSA), 657 and 738 came up to good levels in and out, while the Japanese big 
guns on 594 and 747 hit S9 levels briefly (as 972-HLCA and the 1053 Jammer also 
did, at various times during the session). At 1400 603-HLSA's "Happy FM" ID was 
at a good level, while 657-Pyongyang had similar signals after 1400 with its 
canned female vocal music program. The real star performer of sunrise 
enhancement was 738-BEL2, though, taking advantage of the KCBS fadeout around 
1405 to go on its most energetic run of the season, hitting very
  good levels in and out from 1414 all the way to 1430. In comparison to its 
lackluster signals in September and most of October this was a remarkable 
turnaround for the Taiwan station, with its Chinese female-announced late night 
news almost at ocean coast strength. 

738 BEL2 Penghu, Taiwan Chinese female speech at very good level at 1414; 
steady signals at this level for much of sunrise enhancement after 1415 
https://app.box.com/s/a4teeau3joulofw0jb219kzntjyciee1 

73 and Good DX, 
Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA) 
7.5" loopstick C.Crane Skywave Ultralight + 
15" FSL antenna 


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to