Hi Nick, 

<<< What, no North Korean on 657? They are rarely heard in Victoria, 
yet this morning, they were quite strong. >>> 

657-Pyongyang was checked here several times this morning, but the strong 
signal that you mentioned seems to have passed over Puyallup. Maybe the 
ionosphere finally had mercy on this valley, and decided to send the monotonous 
drivel elsewhere? 

Gary 



----- Original Message -----

From: "Nick Hall-Patch" <[email protected]> 
To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" 
<[email protected]> 
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 9:08:45 AM 
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA Ultralight TP's for 3-21 

What, no North Korean on 657? They are rarely heard in Victoria, 
yet this morning, they were quite strong. 

best wishes, 

Nick 


At 15:12 21-03-17, [email protected] wrote: 
>Thanks to Richard, Steve and Bill for their detailed TP-DXing 
>reports. The Japanese on 594, 693, 747 and 774 were at similar 
>modest strength here, along with 1566-HLAZ at a brief good level 
>before the antenna switch at 1345, and a fair signal in and out from 
>1593-CNR1 just before 1400. 
> 
>But the overwhelming star of the session here seems to have passed 
>over the other DXers-- another monster signal from 972-HLCA, 
>reaching S9 peaks in and out on a single 5 inch FSL from 1320-1400. 
> 
>972 HLCA Dangjin, S. Korea Korean female conversation at a blowtorch 
>level at 1347-- in and out at this strength until the 3 + 1 pips at 1400 
>https://app.box.com/s/otxw1paf6sa51poyi95k61a91xguphlt 
> 
>73 and Good DX, 
>Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA) 
>7.5" loopstick C.Crane Skywave Ultralight + 5 inch "Frequent Flyer" 
>FSL antenna (combo photo from this morning's back yard session posted at 
>https://app.box.com/s/yjbfdrqgj737x7f1xj6zfah4f97xxyyd ) 
> 
> 
> 
>_______________________________________________ 
>IRCA mailing list 
>[email protected] 
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> 
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
>the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> 
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> 
>To Post a message: [email protected] 

Nick Hall-Patch 
Victoria, BC 
Canada 

_______________________________________________ 
IRCA mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers 

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 

To Post a message: [email protected] 


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to