More and more older stations are replacing their original transmitters.
Must be only a handful of old stations from the 40's and 50's still on the
air with their original transmitter, tower and site. I bet Scott Fybush has
that answer.

Todd

On Mar 22, 2017 12:30 PM, "Mike Sanburn" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Oops, guess I can't attach photos here.....ms
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: IRCA <[email protected]> on behalf of Mike Sanburn <
> [email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:29 AM
> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] Oklahoma TP DX 3/21/17
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: IRCA <[email protected]> on behalf of Dennis Gibson <
> [email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:17 AM
> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] Oklahoma TP DX 3/21/17
>
> What's your definition of old school?
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On Mar 22, 2017, at 12:33 AM, Todd S <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > WTAM does get out well,like WSM. Does WTAM still have a old school
> antenna?
> >
> >
> > Todd Skaine
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:55 AM Richard N Allen <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Neil:
> >>
> >> I feel your carrier on 747 was probably JOIB.  Although there is a
> >> possibility it was 4QS, Toowoomba.
> >>
> >> Too bad you have can't hear JOUB 774 as it's the most reliable TP
> here.  I
> >> often joke it's my local NHK outlet
> >>
> >> I agree about V7AB.  I'm always surprised how well WTAM is heard here.
> >>
> >> I haven't tried to hear the X-band Aussies.  I guess I need to give it a
> >> try using the R75 and ALA1530LNP.
> >>
> >> Good DX.
> >>
> >> Richard.
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPad
> >>
> >>> On Mar 21, 2017, at 09:38, Neil Kazaross <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Here from IL at SR. Weak carrier on 747 not sure if from Japan or
> Aussie..
> >>> Weak slopped audio on 1548 barely heard. Yesterday was lots better and
> >>> yesterday's peak signal from 4QD was about 15 dB better than today!
> >>>
> >>> Unfortunately, 774 is ruined by WBBM here and even a 30dB+ tweaked
> >> Vactrol
> >>> back null isn't close to enough.
> >>>
> >>> V7AB 1098 would be logged by quite a few others if it stayed on past
> 1130
> >>> so people could wait for SR to take out WTAM.
> >>>
> >>> Of interest here the past couple of mornings is a reasonable carrier on
> >>> 1701.09. I can always dream about logging Brisvani is much better cx.
> >>>
> >>> 73 KAZ
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> >> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> >> believed to be clean.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> IRCA mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> IRCA Info Page - montreal.kotalampi.com<http://montreal.kotalampi.com/
> mailman/listinfo/irca>
> montreal.kotalampi.com
> This group is for those interested in AM (Broadcast Band) DXing, sponsored
> by the International Radio Club of America (IRCA) To see the collection of
> prior postings ...
>
>
>
> IRCA Info Page - montreal.kotalampi.com<http://montreal.kotalampi.com/
> mailman/listinfo/irca>
> montreal.kotalampi.com
> This group is for those interested in AM (Broadcast Band) DXing, sponsored
> by the International Radio Club of America (IRCA) To see the collection of
> prior postings ...
>
>
>
> >>
> >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> >> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >>
> >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >>
> >> To Post a message: [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: [email protected]
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: [email protected]
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to