I haven't seen any other TP-DX reports this morning, so maybe it was another 
session limited to Puyallup and Victoria? In any case the Asians weren't slowed 
down at all here by any solar activity, managing another good sunrise 
enhancement session all across the band (on a 5" FSL antenna). 

The Japanese big guns were leading the way at my 1320 start time, with 
594-JOAK, 693-JOAB and 747-JOIB already with good signals in the predawn 
darkness. The Korean big guns on 972 and 1566 were at similar strength in and 
out, while a large collection of second tier Asians on 603, 657, 738, 1134, 
1575 and 1593 were in and out of the noise. As sunrise enhancement kicked in 
around 1340 some of these came into fairly decent audio at times, especially 
603-HLSA, 657-Pyongyang, 1134-JOQR and 1575-VOA. The NHK big guns continued 
their dominance throughout the session, with 828-JOBB joining the others after 
the daylight boost. Like yesterday the party fizzled shortly after 1400, 
possibly a premature collapse related to solar activity. In any case there was 
definitely enough propagation and variety to keep Nick busy in his file review 
tonight. 

594 JOAK Tokyo, Japan Japanese male and female speech and interval music at 
good level at 1326 
https://app.box.com/s/4xjlp1pu5dp2jt5jshjrtbxd9l505s2g 

657 Pyongyang BS Pyongyang, N. Korea Stern female harangue rising above the 
noise at 1346 
https://app.box.com/s/7pfao8lk11nt4rjfyllmm2atlq70mqy4 

972 HLCA Dangjin, S. Korea Korean female vocal music at good level at 1347 
https://app.box.com/s/nfxgnvdre8uok75nmew9x6d4i9jti69f 

73 and Good DX, 
Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA) 
7.5" loopstick C.Crane Skywave Ultralight + 
5 inch "Frequent Flyer" FSL antenna 
https://app.box.com/s/2lixzaly97goivq7i3qqj6etrr0ce109 


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to