As a broadcaster first and foremost, Id rather lose a station and have it go off the air then have a station limping along doing no one any good. Broadcasting is a business and the only reason this station lasted as long as it did, was because I think the same family had it , like, forever.
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 7:29 PM, DXer <[email protected]> wrote: > >>I'm a broadcaster and a DX'er.. been DXing since I was 12 or 13. Been > >>a broadcaster for nearly 15 years (i'm 33) > > DXing on/off since about the same age. Around 20 years in telecom, but not > broadcasting. As for current age, let's say you are young enough to be my > son. :^) > > > >>They could drop a few towers and go with lower power, which would >>make > this a potentially viable option. THere's just not alot you can >>do with > an AM signal that has high operating expenses, especially as >>a standalone > in a market where everything is already being done 2-3-4 >>times over. > > This is a much more interesting reply. > > Let's hope somebody buys this "old rotting RF heap of a > radio station", and implement your sugestions. As a DXer, I much prefer > low power stations. > > > Regards, > > Vince > Ottawa, ON > > > _______________________________________________ > IRCA mailing list > [email protected] > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > > To Post a message: [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
