Correction - the date should have been Nov 3 instead of Nov 2

On 11/3/2017 20:13, Bruce Portzer wrote:
Today's TP DX session was unusual when you consider:

-  Nearly all of the action took place between 700 and 1000 kHz.

- The strongest TP signal was China on 981

- Chinese stations in general were better than normal

- HLAZ was barely there today, despite all the fun further down the dial

-

567    JAPAN, JOIK, 1333 Japanese talk fair, slightly stronger than //594

594    JAPAN, JOAK, 1344 Japanese man & woman talk fair

693    JAPAN, JOAB, good signal 1330 w/start of Chinese lesson, moderate CBU splatter

702    JAPAN, NHK2, woman singing 1407 fair-poor //693

738    UNID. 1432 female song & weak talk, probably Taiwan

747    JAPAN, Sapporo JOIB Chinese lesson good 1333

756    CHINA, CNR1 1336 & 1434 weak-fair talk //981

774    JAPAN, Akita, JOUB, Chinese lesson good 1331

792    UNID, traces of male talk 1430

819    N KOREA, orchestral music 1325, short announcement before BoH, 3+1 pips 1330,then woman in Korean.  Good signal but much KGNW splash

828    JAPAN, Osaka JOBB, 1333 Chinese lesson fair //774

837    UNID weak Chinese talk 1337, weak female song ending 1400:20 then weak talk

846    UNID, woman in Chinese 1334 weak

918    UNID, faint talk 1341

945    CHINA, CNR1, 1334 weak woman //981, good w/fast-talking woman 1351

963    CHINA, CRI, 1326 woman in Russian with snippets of music fair

972    S KOREA, HLCA, group discussion good at times but faded 1350

981    CHINA, CNR1, huge signal 1340 w/interview, echo on the audio due to multiple stations.  Fair w/ID 1400:30.  1433 strong w/various ads & announcements, lots of electronic noses

1017    UNID, probably CRI, woman talking weakly 1426

1206    CHINA, Yanbian, Korean talk fair-poor 1357 on 1205.95

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to