Thanks, Nick. After your reception of the new country of 621-Canary Islands last night, I was wondering whether you would take a break this morning and miss out on the fun :-)
It was another marathon TP-DXing session here, and the Chinese were already unusually potent as early as 1215 in the total darkness, managing dominant mixes on both 603 and 657. Fortunately the weather was a little warmer than two days ago (36 degrees). 639 didn't really hit its stride until around 1450, but when it did it was overwhelming. 756 and 936 were also in play, but nowhere near the strength of 603 and 639. Quite a blast! Gary > On February 15, 2018 at 7:59 AM Nick Hall-Patch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > You didn't jinx things Gary. How much was identifiable is another > question. It was quite a tangle, and for some reason, domestic > splash was monstrous this morning, along with a peculiar lack of > audio with many of the strong carriers. > > best wishes, > > Nick > > > > > At 13:39 2018-02-15, Gary DeBock wrote: > >603-China was at a pretty exceptional level (S7) way over HLSA at > >1320, and 657-China was in a mix with Pyongyang as early as 1215. > >Don't want to jinx things, but sunrise enhancement could bring some > >serious fun if these kind of signals hold up. > > > > > >Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA) > > > >_______________________________________________ > >IRCA mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > > > >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the > >original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of > >the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers > > > >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > > > >To Post a message: [email protected] > > Nick Hall-Patch > Victoria, BC > Canada > _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
