The Japanese big guns were out in serious force once again from 1400-1420, but 
there was some worthwhile DX from other areas showing up on certain 
frequencies. Overall the variety seemed a bit down from yesterday, although 
Taiwan's 738-BEL2 managed an even better signal.


In the predawn darkness nothing much happened here (except for the usual big 
guns) until around 1340, when 603-China and 657-Pyongyang started building up 
some modest strength. Usually 603 is a mix of China and HLSA here, but this 
morning the frequency was all China. 639 and 738 are usually tough frequencies 
in the predawn darkness because of California splatter, but a check of 738 at 
1350 revealed a pretty good signal from BEL2, with the lady announcer giving 
the news well over the KCBS splatter. By 1400 the NHK big gun parade had 
started, with S9 signals on 594, 693 and 774, and pretty strong signals on 747 
and 828. The increasing daylight didn't do much for the Chinese stations, 
though, and 639 never managed a signal over the 640 splatter. In contrast to 
yesterday 972-HLCA sounded pretty anemic as well, and brief checks of 756 and 
936 weren't productive. Overall the session wasn't bad for the Japanese big 
guns, but pretty limited for everything else. The bright spot of the
  session was 738-BEL2's good signal at 1350-- about the only time in the 
session that it really managed to break free of KCBS.


603  China   (Hulun Buir?)   All alone on the frequency with Chinese speech at 
1343 in the predawn darkness (HLSA was MIA all morning)  
https://dreamcrafts.box.com/s/dwq260p3485nqsd38qqktdltis3f9emm


738  BEL2   Penghu, Taiwan   The usual lady announcer giving news in Chinese at 
a good level at 1350;  kind of rare at this strength recently  
https://dreamcrafts.box.com/s/vtr4yye6cje0uyue0g3930c222utengn


73 and Good DX,

Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)

7.5" loopstick CC Skywave SSB Ultralight +

15" FSL antenna

 
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to