Hi Pete,

<<< A suggestion. As you review and compare, please note whether the sets have 
the “line out” feature since this is a big help (at least to me). >>>

Yes, normally I would do that in a full review, but this was kind of a special 
case of a foreign-designed model that was unavailable in North America until 
very recently. The individual reports will surely be combined into a full D-808 
review eventually

Unfortunately, the model doesn't have a "line out" recording jack (and as a 
"Frequent Flyer," I know how useful that would be). The D-808 has a powerful 
audio amp, though, very similar to the Tecsun PL-380 and other Si4734 models 
(and much stronger than the rather wimpy CC Skywave audio amp). We will need to 
keep trying our luck with the volume control settings on remote ocean beaches 
:-)

Gary


> On June 1, 2018 at 9:16 PM Pete Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>     Gary,
> 
>     Thanks for your reviews on this new receiver. Having RDS is a big plus.
> 
>     A suggestion. As you review and compare, please note whether the sets 
> have the “line out” feature since this is a big help (at least to me). Thanks.
>      
>     Pete Taylor
>     Tacoma, WA
>     12225w 4719n
>     HQ180 & ICF2010
>     Kiwa aircore & Palomar loops
>     DX398, SRF-59 & M37V
>     Eton E100 + Tecsun PL-300/380
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         > >         On Jun 1, 2018, at 4:31 PM, Gary DeBock 
> <[email protected] mailto:[email protected] > wrote:
> > 
> >         After receiving an inquiry from Mark Roberts concerning the new 
> > XHDATA D-808's FM-DXing sensitivity, I decided to run a detailed comparison 
> > with the Tecsun PL-380-- one of the Si4734 DSP chip models which gained top 
> > FM-DXing honors in the 2015 Ultralight Radio Shootout review. In my very 
> > mediocre Puyallup Valley location (surrounded by hills on 3 sides), I 
> > checked three FM fringe stations which have a reputation for being tough FM 
> > catches
> > 
> > 
> >         The new XHDATA is a very sensitive performer on the FM band. In 
> > direct comparison with the PL-380 in outperformed the Tecsun in the 
> > reception of the low-powered 95.3 KGY in Olympia, WA, 100.3 CKQQ in 
> > Langley, BC, and 106.5 KWPZ in Lynden, WA. The D-808 had 95.3 KGY at a weak 
> > level, while the PL-380 had nothing at all. On 100.3 the D-808 had CKQQ at 
> > a good level (plus an UnID Spanish station under it) while the PL-380 had 
> > only CKQQ at a fair level. On 106.5 the D-808 had KWPZ at a good level, 
> > while the Tecsun had it at a fair level. FM selectivity was identical in 
> > the two models. The D-808 benefits greatly from its 26" (66cm) whip 
> > antenna, compared to the PL-380's 21.75" (55cm) antenna. In addition the 
> > D-808's RDS capability really augments the model's FM-DXing sensitivity, 
> > adding an extra dimension to the entire experience. FM-DXers can order with 
> > confidence!
> > 
> > 
> >         Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
> > 
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         IRCA mailing list
> >         [email protected] mailto:[email protected]
> >         http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > 
> >         Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of 
> > the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > 
> >         For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > 
> >         To Post a message: [email protected]
> > 
> > 
> >     > 
> 
 
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to