Quite a bit livelier today, with emphasis on Asians, but some DU also later on.


pretty darn good audio (all of it understandable by a native speaker, at least 
briefly):

not today



Reasonable audio  at  times during the period (much of it understandable by a 
native speaker, though often battling w/splash or noise):

747 JOIB woman in Japanese 1129UT; the 750 splatter let up for a moment.

774 JOUB English lessons 1121UT






not so reasonable audio, occasional words or phrases in splash or noise could 
be understood by a native speaker: 

612 4QR mentions of ABC news by woman 1204UT

1116 4BC assumed, two men in DU English, teletalk 1137UT



Burbles in the splatter and noise (if lucky, language might be guessed at by 
cadence of talk, or parallel established by changes in talk or music)  

594 man talking,  Japanese intonation 1120UT

594 3WV had been bouncing around with vocal music and DU English sounding talk, 
since 1151UT, not //612, but delivered a weak ABC fanfare at 1200UT

693 JOAB man talking //747 1128UT

702 pop vocal 1132UT;  suspect 2BL, but could be NZ; definitely not NHK2

828 JOBB man talking //747 1120UT

1017 man talking, island language?  woman on phone 1135UT;  Tonga suspected

1134 laid back vocal music 1112UT; Korea?

1287 woman talking, Japanese?  1119UT; too much splash for certainty

1566 man talking Chinese intonation 1114UT








Strongish het, no or "near imaginary" audio (either undermodulated or ravaged 
by splatter)

972 1422 seemed to be Asian;
558 576 585 738 756 846 855 909  1098  seemed to be DU 



best wishes,

Nick








Nick Hall-Patch
Victoria, BC
Canada  

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to