The Kiwis were definitely on the warpath again this morning as multiple 
obscure stations had their best session in quite a while (and 738-Magic had its 
best session ever). The 594-Star duo hit S9, as did 963-Star. Alexandra was 
especially well represented with a couple of 2 kW stations (531-More FM and 
639-RNZ) pounding in at times. Even the "dwarf Star" (576) managed to silence 
the 50 kW Oz big gun 2RN.

     Unfortunately the "sleeping squatters" had once again jammed up Rockwork 
4, as well as Rockwork 5. Craig followed me to the relatively large Rockwork 6 
turnoff (the one with the highest elevation), and we did our setup at the 
southern end, as far as possible from several RV's. The transoceanic 
propagation at Rockwork 6 certainly didn't disappoint, and we had another 
thrilling session tracking down multiple low powered NZ stations. The 
notoriously tough 531-More FM cooperated nicely with 3 ID's in 3 minutes at 
1247-- a male-voiced ID at 14 seconds, a female-voiced ID at 15 seconds, and 
another female-voiced ID at 3:26  
https://dreamcrafts.box.com/s/p2et4xa8e602y0ocbzuongxziw7xafrc 

Up until now 531-More FM had only been heard at Rockwork 4 on the west coast, 
but now it has finally been heard in a new place-- Rockwork 6 :-) More details 
to follow...

73 and Good DX,

Gary DeBock (DXing at Rockwork 6 with Craig Barnes)

Session photos from this morning posted at 
https://dreamcrafts.box.com/s/exthrjjmdfmtphpsl8wvs8sogy3bdqu1

and https://dreamcrafts.box.com/s/xigucktp07306guw0fh3e4ep49f4qepb

7.5" loopstick CC Skywave SSB and XHDATA D-808 portables + 15" and 17" 
DXpedition FSL antennas


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to