The development of modern Ferrite Sleeve Loop antennas has been one of the most 
remarkable antenna breakthroughs of the 21st century, but since none of these 
have ever been mass produced for commercial sale, a lot of questions and 
misconceptions about their function and effectiveness persist in the general 
AM-DXing community. This brief message is an attempt to clear up some of the 
more common misconceptions.


Modern FSL antennas are based upon an experimental article published by the 
U.K.'s Graham Maynard in February of 2011, describing a cylindrical collection 
of ferrite rods wrapped by a wire coil, and tuned by a variable capacitor to 
resonate with (and provide an inductively coupled gain boost for) a nearby 
portable radio tuned to the same frequency  
http://www.zen22142.zen.co.uk/Media/fsi.htm

Graham's original article included quite a bit of "unusual" scientific theory 
(for which he was roundly criticized) and provoked accusations of design 
plagiarism and exaggerated performance claims. Flying "under the radar," 
however, three dedicated antenna experimenters in the relatively new Ultralight 
Radio enthusiast group (Steve Ratzlaff, Kevin Schanilec and yours truly) began 
extensive, all-out experimentation in the new FSL design to test it out in the 
"real world" of ocean coast transoceanic DXing-- both on Longwave and Medium 
Wave.


Steve, Kevin and I shared information on which components were the most 
effective, and which designs seemed to provide the highest gain. For a brief 
time we all worked toward the goal of maximum gain, purchasing huge lots of 
200mm x 10mm ferrite rods from the Ukraine (to the delight of the eBay sellers, 
who must now be enjoying early retirement). Of course we didn't all agree on 
the design factors influencing maximum gain, but one thing was becoming very 
obvious-- this new antenna had a compact gain advantage like none other in 
radio history.


Given the fact that this new antenna could provide tons of gain from an 
extremely small "footprint," I knew that this innovative antenna finally 
provided an ideal chance to test out a fascinating new theory that I've always 
believed in-- that an ocean cliff's flat shape could enhance transoceanic DX 
reception far beyond that possible on a nearby flat ocean beach. In early 2011 
this idea was laughed off by almost all of the transoceanic DXers, who had 
routinely set up their huge broadband antennas on flat ocean beaches for 
decades. Nobody had ever tried a serious DXpedition on a plunging ocean side 
cliff, since there wasn't enough space at such sites to set up a "serious" 
broadband antenna-- or so they thought. But they were about to be proven wrong.


An early 8" (20cm) diameter FSL antenna was set up at two plunging Oregon coast 
cliffs in the summer of 2012-- at Rockwork 4 (near Manzanita), and at Cape 
Perpetua (near Yachats). Immediately the new FSL antenna began receiving 
multiple New Zealand stations that had never been heard on the North American 
west coast, including 531-More FM, 585-Radio Ngati Porou, 765-Radio Kahungunu 
and 828-Trackside. Perseus-SDR DXer Chuck Hutton was interested enough to join 
me for a July 2014 Rockwork 4 DXpedition, during which the all-time Grayland 
record for New Zealand reception was completely shattered-- 88 Kiwi stations 
(compared to 61 at Grayland). Chuck's broadband antenna was a tiny version of 
the Grayland monsters, but ocean cliff propagation enhancement more than made 
up the difference.


A side effect of the ocean cliff "Monster FSL" development was, unfortunately, 
the "expensive and heavy" reputation that currently ligers in the AM-DXing 
community. It was commonly joked that these new antennas could "shut down an 
airport without really trying," that a body builder would need to deploy them, 
and that they were far beyond the means of the average DXer. In late 2016 a new 
type of compact, lightweight FSL was designed to dispel all of these 
misconceptions, however-- the "Frequent Flyer" FSL antennas.


Even though the new antennas had proven to be the ultimate compact gain 
performers, it was a radical design concept to shrink the antenna down to a 
miniature size for TSA acceptance, while retaining enough gain performance to 
be a real thriller on exotic ocean beaches. The construction cost would need to 
be acceptable for the majority of DXers, and the design would need to survive a 
lot of travel abuse. In late 2016 two new "Frequent Flyer" FSL designs were 
finally built, and throughout 2017 Craig Barnes and I tested them out in 
thrilling Hawaii DXpeditions, tracking down all sorts of exotic Pacific island 
DX. Pete Taylor took one of the models on European and Caribbean cruises, and 
in April I had the hobby thrill of a lifetime in the Cook Islands, tracking 
down long range AM-DX stations in India (at over 8,000 miles), Bangladesh, 
Mongolia, Cambodia and Brazil-- all with a radio and antenna that easily fit 
within hand carry luggage.


In an effort to make these compact, TSA-friendly FSL antennas available to more 
DXers there were 10 models given out last year, and a full "Heathkit-like" 
construction article for the 3.5 inch "Baby FSL" model was written, and posted 
at http://www.mediafire.com/file/pnfm8909c77zjoy/3.5inch-FF-FSL.doc/file

More resources and refinements will be devoted to these "Frequent Flyer" FSL 
antennas this year, with the goal of making these breakthrough models 
accessible to all interested DXers. Whether your preference is to chase long 
range DX on an exotic ocean beach or simply have thrilling portable DXing 
sessions close to home, this new type of antenna may be your ticket to 
increased hobby excitement.


73 and Good DX,

Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)        
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to