Craig,

The dreary propagation reported by Colin, Nick and Walt was the same here. 
Compared to yesterday, the TP-DX this morning kind of fell off of a cliff (an 
expression best avoided in the summer).

At 1255 a band check was made here to determine whether to deploy to a local 
park for a noise-free TP-DXing session, but even the big gun Asian carriers 
were stuck in the noise. It was obviously a lost cause, and I'm sorry that the 
dud propagation showed up at Tofino right when you did.

Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
> On October 8, 2018 at 9:05 AM Donald Barnes via IRCA wrote:
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
> contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
> editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: [email protected]
>

> On October 8, 2018 at 9:05 AM Donald Barnes wrote:
>
>
> Thankfully whatever generated the high pitched whine yesterday was gone this 
> morning. I listened from 1350 to 1435. It was a Japanese morning here, albeit 
> limited.
>
> 594 JOAK male and female in JJ, fair Noticeable, but brief pre sunrise 
> enhancement w/female in JJ
>
> 693 JOAB nice to hear Brazilian Portuguese on JOAB again, later good w/EE 
> lesson, faded up at 1350
>
> 738 w/male in indistinguishable language, barely audible
>
> 828 JOBB w/ male in JJ, weak
>
> 1287 JOHR w/female in JJ, faint
>
> Curiously naught but hets from JOIB and JOUB. Several other hets also present.
>
> 73 and Best of DX
>
> Craig Barnes
> DXing from Tin Wis Resort
> Tofino, BC
>
> Supercharged Tecsun PL-380 w/5” TSA Friendly FSL
>
> Sent from my iPhone
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to