<<< Not so much of a Chinese morning here in Victoria Gary, at least
during the live listening. Was barely able to dig out 639 for
example, and didn't find 963 as strong as yesterday (hardly at all), >>>

Thanks Nick,

639-CNR1 was a non-performer here as well, which was very strange considering 
the potent Chinese on 603 and 657. Maybe it has transmitter issues? As for 
963-CRI, this was its signal here around 1418 in Russian (with minor splatter) 
https://dreamcrafts.box.com/s/yolids3oux2qb8v9p93bzhqz71smdt5c

Gary

> On October 18, 2018 at 8:37 AM Nick Hall-Patch <[email protected] 
> mailto:[email protected] > wrote:
> 
> 
>     Not so much of a Chinese morning here in Victoria Gary, at least
>     during the live listening. Was barely able to dig out 639 for
>     example, and didn't find 963 as strong as yesterday (hardly at all),
>     but you're right, 603 had Chinese dominant at one point, with
>     apparent Korea earlier on. Maybe there will be more heard when
>     going over the recording.
> 
>     best wishes,
> 
>     Nick
> 
> 
>     At 15:23 2018-10-18, Gary DeBock wrote:
>     >The low and middle band were full of Chinese signals this morning
>     >after 1400, with 603-China dominant over HLSA, 657-China at equal
>     >strength with Pyongyang, 738-BEL2 at S9, 963-CRI very strong in
>     >Russian, etc. It was easily the best Chinese morning of the season
>     >here so far-- full details to follow.
>     >
>     >738-BEL2 Penghu, Taiwan Female Chinese at S9 level at 1422 (best
>     >signal ever here)
>     >
>     >https://dreamcrafts.box.com/s/od9um1sx0yvg98c27k75js3jwkajh6cs
>     >
>     >
>     >Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
>     >
>     >7.5" loopstick CC Skywave Ultralight + 15" FSL antenna
>     >
>     >
>     >_______________________________________________
>     >IRCA mailing list
>     [email protected]">>[email protected]
>     >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>     >
>     >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>     >original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
>     >the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>     >
>     >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>     >
>     >To Post a message: [email protected] mailto:[email protected]
> 
>     Nick Hall-Patch
>     Victoria, BC
>     Canada
> 
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to