There was one part of the discussion that was a bit unclear. I wasn't sure if they meant "under" the absorption zone to mean "South of it" or to mean "traversing beneath" the absorption or interchangeably both. If there was an intent for "beneath", then I'd have expected a further discussion of paths going over ( above ) the absorption. At MW, we likely see all three.
Russ Edmunds WB2BJH Blue Bell, PA Grid FN20id ________________________________ From: IRCA <[email protected]> on behalf of Mark Durenberger <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2018 3:14:45 PM To: 'Mark Connelly'; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [IRCA] propagation article GREAT piece! Mark, thanks for sharing. Cheers! Mark Durenberger -----Original Message----- From: Mark Connelly <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2018 1:01 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: propagation article Maybe of some relevance to MW DX: <<Here is an interesting pdf document including information on the effects of Earth's Electron Gyrofrequency on 160 meters. The 160-Meter Band: An Enigma Shrouded in Mystery http://solar.spacew.com/cq/cqmar98.pdf Jerry, K4SAV>> _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected] _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
