If it's an option to load the assemblies then users may as well just add the code to load it themselves. I think the point of fixing the bug was reducing the frustration factor when first using the hosting APIs and having it just work. So I'm fine w/ just closing it.
From: Slide [mailto:slide.o....@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 5:39 PM To: Dino Viehland Cc: ironpython-users@python.org Subject: Re: [Ironpython-users] Work Item 19249 I was planning on making it an option to load assemblies, the current behavior would be the default. I am thinking it would be best to leave as-is though. Either that, or allow passing in assemblies to CreateEngine to add references to. On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Dino Viehland <di...@microsoft.com<mailto:di...@microsoft.com>> wrote: I'm fine w/ either, but if it's an option it should be an option which disables adding the references for scenarios like Markus wants (otherwise there really is no reason to do it). From: ironpython-users-bounces+dinov=microsoft....@python.org<mailto:microsoft....@python.org> [mailto:ironpython-users-bounces+dinov<mailto:ironpython-users-bounces%2Bdinov>=microsoft....@python.org<mailto:microsoft....@python.org>] On Behalf Of Slide Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 4:02 PM To: ironpython-users@python.org<mailto:ironpython-users@python.org> Subject: [Ironpython-users] Work Item 19249 I'd like to get the thoughts of the community on work item 19249 [1]. I am thinking we want to either make it an option, or just leave it as is. I prefer the latter. Thanks, slide [1] http://ironpython.codeplex.com/workitem/19249 -- Website: http://earl-of-code.com -- Website: http://earl-of-code.com
_______________________________________________ Ironpython-users mailing list Ironpython-users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ironpython-users
