No, create a new one. That datetime one is so big (and out of date) that it might never be closed. I prefer them to be small pieces.
- Jeff On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Cesar Mello <cme...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is a work item for missing datetime features: > > http://ironpython.codeplex.com/workitem/17470 > > So should I just insert a comment instead of creating a new work item? > > Thanks! > > Best regards > Mello > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Jeff Hardy <jdha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Just an oversight. Can you open an issue on ironpython.codeplex.com? >> Should be easy enough to get this in. If you're up to it, a pull >> request would be even better :) >> >> - Jeff >> >> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Cesar Mello <cme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi! >> > >> > This method doesn't seem to be implemented. From >> > http://docs.python.org/library/datetime.html : >> > timedelta.total_seconds() >> > >> > Return the total number of seconds contained in the duration. Equivalent >> > to >> > (td.microseconds + (td.seconds + td.days * 24 * 3600) * 10**6) /10**6 >> > computed with true division enabled. >> > >> > Note that for very large time intervals (greater than 270 years on most >> > platforms) this method will lose microsecond accuracy. >> > >> > New in version 2.7. >> > >> > >> > Best regards! >> > Mello >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Ironpython-users mailing list >> > Ironpython-users@python.org >> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ironpython-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ Ironpython-users mailing list Ironpython-users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ironpython-users
